[wlug] Wiki usage

Don't think it's worth disabling warnings:

http://osdir.com/ml/web.wiki.phpwiki.talk/2007-01/msg00023.html

On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 9:10 PM, Bruce Kingsbury <zcat@z...> wrote:
> BTW we get odd warnings with every edit, for about as long as I can
> remember. Anyone feel like making these go away?
>
> Warning!
>
> lib/ArchiveCleaner.php:109: Notice: Warning: Page 'SaturdayWorkshop',
> version '10' has no '_supplanted' timestamp (...repeated 3 times)
>
>
> On 3 March 2010 22:30, John Billings <john@n...> wrote:
>> Our aims are pretty low, call it preventive maintenance.  I think
>> someone called it a clean up?  Not that it's a mess, just most of us
>> don't know where anything is, so more like a discovery process.   This
>> is what I know:
>>
>> http://wlug.org.nz/DevEnvironment
>>
>> I've found the repo so I'm happy, I'll go play :)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> John
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Matt Brown <matt@m...> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 10:23 PM, John Billings <john@n...> wrote:
>>>> Hi Matt,
>>>>
>>>> Some of us on the committee have talked about testing an upgrade of
>>>> the wiki in our backup server (tarua.wlug.org.nz).   We have Lenny
>>>> installed there now, (maybe we should upgrade to squeeze first since
>>>> it will be stable theoretically soon) and would like to have a go at
>>>> upgrading to a new stack, postgres 8.4/9, php5 ect...
>>>
>>> Why? are there problems with the current setup?
>>>
>>>> John M pointed me to the svn repo, but I just found this page:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.wlug.org.nz/WlugWikiPatches
>>>>
>>>> That was last edited about 4 years ago.   I wonder if we should check
>>>> out the code from svn.wlug.org.nz or look at getting code from
>>>> wherever phpwiki is at now, and look at adding back in any
>>>> customizations?  Anyhow any advice is appreciated, btw if anyone else
>>>> wants to help, please let the committee know.
>>>
>>> PHPwiki hasn't changed much in the past 4 years. It's essentially
>>> dead/in maintenance mode upstream.
>>>
>>> We did put some effort into pushing our patches upstream, but given
>>> that there isn't much activity there it wasn't a very worthwhile
>>> effort.
>>>
>>> So depending on what your aims are with this you may be disappointed.
>>> You're unlikely to get any useful new features.
>>>
>>> The svn repo is of course available and you're free to play ;)
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> --
>>> Matt Brown
>>> matt@m...
>>> Mob +353 86 608 7117 www.mattb.net.nz
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> wlug mailing list | wlug@l...
>>> Unsubscribe: http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/wlug
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> wlug mailing list | wlug@l...
>> Unsubscribe: http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/wlug
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Disclaimer:
> By sending an email to any of my addresses you are agreeing that:
>   1. I am by definition, "the intended recipient"
>   2. All information in the email is mine to do with as I see fit and
> make such financial profit, political mileage, or good joke as it
> lends itself to.
>   3. I may take the contents as representing the views of your company.
>   4. This overrides any disclaimer or statement of confidentiality
> that may be included on your message.
> _______________________________________________
> wlug mailing list | wlug@l...
> Unsubscribe: http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/wlug
>