On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 16:01 +1200, Ian McDonald wrote:
WlugCharter page. See rule 5 and rule 9. Also see WlugCharterDiscussion
So a post to the list, now, is sufficient notice?
"The WLUG Comittee have proposed a small change to the constitution to clear up the issue of who's allowed to sign cheques, because the current wording seems to exclude the President from being a signatory. This will be brought up at the AGM. You have been notified." :)
On 8/7/07, Bruce Kingsbury zcat@wired.net.nz wrote:
On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 16:01 +1200, Ian McDonald wrote:
WlugCharter page. See rule 5 and rule 9. Also see WlugCharterDiscussion
So a post to the list, now, is sufficient notice?
I think we need to draft the change before it is sufficient notice. Can you have a go at that please?
"The WLUG Comittee have proposed a small change to the constitution to clear up the issue of who's allowed to sign cheques, because the current wording seems to exclude the President from being a signatory. This will be brought up at the AGM. You have been notified." :)
wlug mailing list | wlug@list.waikato.ac.nz Unsubscribe: http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/wlug
On 8/7/07, Bruce Kingsbury zcat@wired.net.nz wrote:
On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 16:01 +1200, Ian McDonald wrote:
WlugCharter page. See rule 5 and rule 9. Also see WlugCharterDiscussion
So a post to the list, now, is sufficient notice?
I think we need to draft the change before it is sufficient notice. Can you have a go at that please? And post to the charter discussion page as well.
"The WLUG Comittee have proposed a small change to the constitution to clear up the issue of who's allowed to sign cheques, because the current wording seems to exclude the President from being a signatory. This will be brought up at the AGM. You have been notified." :)
participants (2)
-
Bruce Kingsbury -
Ian McDonald