Just to continue what Mark said, I am not really expecting for this to
get approved. I am hoping it will. If anything maybe it will bring
more discussion around enum and using VoIP in New Zealand.
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 12:33 PM, Mark Foster <blakjak(a)blakjak.net> wrote:
On Wed, December 24, 2008 12:13 pm, Nathan Ward
On 24/12/2008, at 10:37 AM, James Jones wrote:
for now yes
In addition, the nameservers for freedomnet.co.nz are both on virtual
hosting servers in the states, at a single provider.
I would suggest putting at least one of your DNS servers (for all the
domains in the chain, not just the ones you propose to be
authoritative for 4.6.e164.arpa.) in NZ. Preferably several of them,
up and down the country on many different networks.
Before NZNOG'rs start ripping James to bits, perhaps he and others need to
and then ask
the question... why isn't the zone already delegated somewhere? And if
it's to be delegated, shouldn't it be to someone involved in the project?
Pointing the finger at the holes in James's setup/application is somewhat
redundant, if James is unlikely to be approved as DNS host by
MED/thepowersthatbe on the grounds of a longer-standing ENUM Taskforce for
the NZ range, for starters...
NZNOG mailing list
+64 6 3678300
+1 413 771 1402