The Alcatel-Lucent 7210 range may be ok for what you want. The QoS features are cut down
from the bigger 7450 or 7750 boxes but should be ok for per-queue and per-sub interface.
However the 7210 devices will cost more than Mikrotik...
From: nznog-bounces(a)list.waikato.ac.nz [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On Behalf
Of Rob McDonald
Sent: Thursday, 22 December 2011 10:36 a.m.
To: Anton Smith
Subject: Re: [nznog] QinQ box
If your after "cheep cheep" look at Mikrotik Routerboard, they have many
different options of CPU vs port density.
I haven't had much trouble with them, I use them everywhere - be wary of crappy
wall-wart PSUs that's the only trouble I've had.
Otherwise I'll leave to other people to respond about what other manufacturers would
be interested in helping you part with significantly more money. :-)
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Anton Smith
Given the handover options from Chorus for UFB (http://www.chorus.co.nz/file/1591
anybody have any recommendations about a cost effective GE based node that can do QinQ
happily? Port density probably only needs to be 2-4 ports. Control/forwarding redundancy
And, preferably with the capability to set individual policers and/or queue rates on each
I don't know if chorus give you the option to do the rate limiting for you or not -
does anybody know?
NZNOG mailing list
Rob McDonald | Director
[Description: Image removed by sender.]
Level 2 Systems Ltd
M: +64 21 902 929
eFax: +64 9 974 4734
This email and attachments: are confidential; may be protected by privilege and copyright;
if received in error may not be used, copied, or kept; are not guaranteed to be
virus-free; may not express the views of Kordia(R); do not designate an information
system; and do not give rise to any liability for Kordia(R).