Hi
I agree, NAT is supposed to be almost impossible to detect.
Change your dial-in password now and see what happens next billing cycle? Perhaps your mate who you helped to setup his computer will ring you later this week to tell you the Internet connection you helped him with has stopped working?
Of course I have done that before.
Gund
-----Original Message-----
From: James Clark [mailto:jamesc@bofh.co.nz]
Sent: Fri 19/11/2004 12:04
To: Waikato Linux Users Group
Cc:
Subject: Re: [wlug] Overlapping usage nonsense
On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 11:17:58AM +1300, Jared Wigmore wrote:
> Having got a network and Internet connection sharing
> set up (thanks Bruce), Xtra is now charging my family
> for "overlapping usage" via my Linux computer. (The
> Internet connection is on the family computer, with
> Windows XP professional.)
Overlapping usage:
http://www.xtra.co.nz/help/0,,6155-1452314,00.html
(if the link works)
I suspect someone is dialling up with your account simultaniously,
not because your NAT-ing...
James.
_______________________________________________
wlug mailing list | wlug(a)list.waikato.ac.nz
Unsubscribe: http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/wlug
Hi All,
I did make sure that I had a good repo and plenty of
mirrors then "yum update"
There were 54 items to d/load. at the 11th file, some three
hours later (at 47k), a thing called "gzip" failed to down
load so it tried mirror after mirror very slowly. Failing on
each occasion. I think it was at the fourteenth unsuccessful
mirror attempt that I began cutting 25mm lengths off the
modem cord. The mirror sites then went by much more quickly
as they were unable to connect. The success in this is that
there were TONNES of mirrors to try if only I had waited a
couple more days things may have been OK and I could have
got on with updating yum and possibly installing mplayer.
I am finding Fedora to be bad for my self esteem and
I note with horror that I have forced myself into the
position of the official "idiot question asker". To this end
I am unsubscribing from the mailing list so as not to
broadcast my ineptitude to all and sundry when doing fubars
in the future.
The distro that has given me the least grief is
"Mandrake"> (yep. Windows user) If any one is willing to
burn me a good copy of the latest issue I would be happy if
they would contact me off list.
Many thanks to all the list members.
Regards John.
> A bad checksum probably means the file corrupted while you
> were downloading it. Possible reasons for this are:
>
> 1) a web proxy in your path (transparent or otherwise) has
> an incomplete copy cached
> 2) the file changed while you were downloading it
> 3) yum didn't actually finish downloading the file
> 4) the copy on the server is incomplete or corrupt.
>
> To fix this, try running 'yum update' then 'yum install
> mplayer' when the update finishes. If that doesn't work,
> try adding more yum mirrors to your mirror list - I
> notice that your output contained comments regarding 'No
> more mirrors to try' etc.
>
>
> As to your second question - it carried on because only
> one part of the download failed, the others are all
> intact.
>
> > Thought I was doing fairly good, Wgot the public
> key. >Copied freshrpms, fixed a parsing error but now got
> a >checksum problem.
> >I have saved the whole drama if anyone has time to help I
> >would apreciatte it
> >Terminal entries follow:
> >
> >[root@localhost john]# yum install mplayer
> >
> ..
>
> >http://ayo.freshrpms.net/fedora/linux/3/i386/freshrpms/RP
> MS/mplayer-1.0-0.12.20041025.1.fc3.fr.i386.rpm: >[Errno
> -1] Package does not match checksum >freshrpms: [Errno
> 256] No more mirrors to try. >[root@localhost john]#
> >
> >
> >Also why go through the whole download if the thing fails
> >the checksum*
> >Regards John
> >
> >
>
The WLUG meeting is on monday
----------------------------------------------------------------------
!!The Official Annual [WLUG] End of Year Barbeque!
In accordance with the prophecy, our end of 2004 [BBQ] is at DaHoose, 3 Liston Crescent, Hillcrest (off Helena Road, by the Gate 1 entrance to Uni/Clyde St roundabout). If it's wet, the backup day is Friday the 10th.
WLUG will provide salad, soft drinks, backyard cricket and entertainment. You will need to bring yourself, meat and alcohol should you desire any of these things.
Check out photos from last years barbeque from [John|http://www.wlug.org.nz/~jrm/wlug-bbq/], [Kyle|http://www.feet.net.nz/gallery/wlugbbq/] or [Phil|http://www.nevada.net.nz/gallery/wlug03].
The WLUG mailing list is the discussion-list extension of the Waikato
Linux Users Group.
As such, we expect members of this list to adhere to the principles
espoused in our official Charter[1], in particular, Rule 6, which covers
the activities on this mailing list.
While this is an Acceptable Use Policy, the WLUG committee do recognise
the need for informal discussion among list members, and draconian
administration is not the goal of this policy. Please keep in mind,
however, that your comments to this list do represent the WLUG, and
while it is good to be seen as an organisation with a sense of humour,
some comments may do serious harm to our credibility as a serious
advocate of GNU/Linux and all things Free Software/Open Source related.
List discussion:
* Should not commit slander or libel against any person or
organisation
* Should not be unprofessional or petty, especially with respect to
the names of other software companies
* Should not indulge in ad hominem attacks
* Should not reproduce copyrighted material without permission from
the copyright holder
* Should not indulge in marketing or advertising, other than on a
private sale basis, or advertising of jobs - which may be
announced once only.
* Should maintain a reasonable level of spelling and grammar
* Should be honest
* Should not promote or denigrate political, cultural, or religious
views
* Should not continue inflammatory or abusive threads
* Should accentuate the positive, without hyperbole or blatant
misrepresentation
Posters who consistently violate these guidelines will be dealt with at
the discretion of the List Maintainer.
If you feel you have been unfairly dealt with, you have recourse to any
member of the WLUG Committee[2].
[1] http://www.wlug.org.nz/WlugCharter
[2] http://www.wlug.org.nz/WlugCommittee
Many thanks,
Will try your suggestions.
Regards John
----- Original Message Follows -----
>
> A bad checksum probably means the file corrupted while you
> were downloading it. Possible reasons for this are:
>
> 1) a web proxy in your path (transparent or otherwise) has
> an incomplete copy cached
> 2) the file changed while you were downloading it
> 3) yum didn't actually finish downloading the file
> 4) the copy on the server is incomplete or corrupt.
>
> To fix this, try running 'yum update' then 'yum install
> mplayer' when the update finishes. If that doesn't work,
> try adding more yum mirrors to your mirror list - I
> notice that your output contained comments regarding 'No
> more mirrors to try' etc.
>
>
> As to your second question - it carried on because only
> one part of the download failed, the others are all
> intact.
>
> > Thought I was doing fairly good, Wgot the public
> key. >Copied freshrpms, fixed a parsing error but now got
> a >checksum problem.
> >I have saved the whole drama if anyone has time to help I
> >would apreciatte it
> >Terminal entries follow:
> >
> >[root@localhost john]# yum install mplayer
> >
> ..
>
> >http://ayo.freshrpms.net/fedora/linux/3/i386/freshrpms/RP
> MS/mplayer-1.0-0.12.20041025.1.fc3.fr.i386.rpm: >[Errno
> -1] Package does not match checksum >freshrpms: [Errno
> 256] No more mirrors to try. >[root@localhost john]#
> >
> >
> >Also why go through the whole download if the thing fails
> >the checksum*
> >Regards John
> >
> >
>
Hi again,
I have not managed to find an answer to this as yet, managed
to get google down to six or so possibles. None of those
seemed to match my problem. Another thread suggests that the
install was bad but I do not think so.
I will re-read the Fedora wiki in case I missed it the first
few times *sigh*
Regards John.
<edited terminal display below>
> Is this ok [y/N]: y
> Downloading Packages:
> mplayer-1.0-0.12.20041025 100% |=========================|
> 899 kB 05:39
>
http://ayo.freshrpms.net/fedora/linux/3/i386/freshrpms/RPMS/mplayer-1.0-0.1…:
> [Errno -1] Package does not match checksum
> <*Why is this???????????????????????????????????????????>
> Trying other mirror.
> faad2-2.0-2.20040923.1.fc 100% |=========================|
> 201 kB 01:25
> libpostproc-1.0-0.12.2004 100% |=========================|
> 43 kB 00:11
> xvidcore-1.0.2-2.1.fc3.fr 100% |=========================|
> 238 kB 01:12
> aalib-1.4.0-5.1.fc3.fr.i3 100% |=========================|
> 95 kB 00:27
> mplayer-fonts-1.1-2.fr.no 100% |=========================|
> 1.0 MB 04:56
> libdvdread-0.9.4-5.1.fc3. 100% |=========================|
> 55 kB 00:15
> xmms-1.2.10-9.1.1.fc3.fr. 100% |=========================|
> 1.9 MB 09:38
> lzo-1.08-3.1.fc3.fr.i386. 100% |=========================|
> 55 kB 00:15
> lame-3.96.1-2.1.fc3.fr.i3 100% |=========================|
> 488 kB 02:23
> libmad-0.15.1b-3.1.fc3.fr 100% |=========================|
> 79 kB 00:23
> libdvdcss-1.2.8-4.1.fc3.f 100% |=========================|
> 34 kB 00:09
> Error Downloading Packages:
> mplayer - 1.0-0.12.20041025.1.fc3.fr.i386: failure:
> RPMS/mplayer-1.0-0.12.20041025.1.fc3.fr.i386.rpm from
> freshrpms: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try.
> [root@localhost john]#
>
Also why go through the whole download if the thing fails
the checksum*
Regards John
>
> _______________________________________________
> wlug mailing list | wlug(a)list.waikato.ac.nz
> Unsubscribe:
> http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/wlug
For what it is worth (and in this case quite a bit)
I had a look at one our library books "How Linux Works" and thought that
I would need to buy it and use for reference. John Mc said buying
from O'Reilly's, members get a 20% discount. I checked Dymocks Auckand
and they could get me one for $94.95 and would take 6-8 weeks to arrive
from the US.
So I ordered it from O'Reilly's website for $US30.36 (including
discount) The only shipping option was DHL (courier) and it was not
until I had given my credit card details and the invoice was created
that I could see the shipping charge. $US31.60.
Then I checked on Amazon (never a good move to check other prices after
the tranaction has taken place). Below are the comparisons.
Dymocks Auck
$NZ94.95 + postage to me
O'Reilly's
$US30.36 book
$US31.60 shipping (Supposedly 2 days but it hasn't arrived after 4 days)
$NZ83.00 total
Amazon
$US25.05 Book
$US11.98 Shipping (1-2 vweeks)
$NZ37.03 Total
