Eric is right, by last night I'd given
up, didn't see the point. You weren't listening. I presented my
current peeves against systemd and barely even got an
acknowledgment they are a problem, big or small.
But by your own standard
me with questions about my personal experience *was* the trolling.
Of course I ignored those "questions" as they weren't material to
the facts I posted. I wasn't fishing you at all, I presented
facts. My personal working experience with Linux is immaterial to
the facts in the bug reports and news articles about systemd.
What set of experience and credentials would have acceptable to
you? You already had your big WLUG meeting and determined for all
time in one evening that systemd is beyond reproach and no further
argumentation on it will ever be accepted. You don't care about
the bugs and articles that have come up, or that Linus Torvalds
himself has said he can't trust "init" to do the sane thing
anymore. If the founder of the Kernel isn't good enough for you to
at least admit there could be a problem, I'm not going to change
On 07/27/2017 09:52 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 07:50:09 +1200, Eric Light wrote:
People with differing options to you are not
necessarily trolls ...
There is a certain style of ... “debate” (to put it broadly)
<http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/Troll>. Particularly from
those with no experience of the subject--as I tried to determine from
Your consistently aggressive stance on the subject is unnecessary and
*Yawn* We’ve been through this nonsense before
William pointed out, after yet more criticism online, nobody actually
turned up in person to point out why systemd was so “awful”.
wlug mailing list | email@example.com