On Thu, 06 Jul 2017 12:07:19 +1200, gb wrote:
My suspicion is that systemd is riddled with spooky
contributing 'bugs' that act conveniently as backdoors for enabling
eavesdropping or even covert remote execution. But plausibly deniable
of course, (now you can deny it).
Is that spelled out clearly enough for you?
What is the basis for your suspicion? Remember systemd is open source,
you are free to inspect it for “backdoors” or whatever. Who are these
Contributing compromised code to open source projects
is a well-known
The fact that systemd was intent on getting into every
corner of the
linux OS ...
How do you think it succeeded in winning over supporters? Brainwashing?