John R. McPherson
Mon Aug 26 14:46:55 NZST 2002
Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> OT, but you got that wrong I'm afraid. That person was called in to fix
> a problem or two with an existing Debian server someone else had
> installed, which involved some package updates. Updating those packages
> screwed a few things, not appreciated for a production server. Problems
> were in the area of package dependencies, which seems to make a lot of
> that debian-packagement-is-super-duper look like hype.
I have *never* seen screwed up debian package dependencies in a
stable debian distribution. You weren't using the "unstable" branch on
a production machine now, were you?
> Personally I still fail to see what advantages the debian package
> management system has which rpm couldn't do as well. As someone who
> uses SuSE too I think I'll stay with that.
.rpm and .deb have about the same capabilities as a package format.
apt-get just manages the downloads of dependencies, while a similar tool
did not exist until recently for rpm-based distros.
(But I'm guessing you already know this... this is for the benefit of
others who might not!)
More information about the wlug
NOTICE: This is an archive of a public mailing list. The University of Waikato is not responsible for its contents.