Tue Apr 5 12:31:31 NZST 2005
I wouldn't take HTML in email as far as images anyway. HTML is simply
for styling better than plaintext can allow; not for building a website
and then sending it to someone :) Images should be attached if they are
> On 5 Apr 2005 at 11:59, wlug-request@l... wrote:
>>Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 11:41:56 +1200
>>From: Bnonn <bnonn@o...>
>>I'm not meaning to stir or be a pest; I just don't understand why any
>>mail client in use today would not support HTML; or why people would
>>turn it off? Surely, unless you're using OE, security isn't a problem.
> Ummm, you're missing several other security issues. An example would be the exploit
> that is available via GIF images.
> My modern eMail reader (copyright 2004) doesn't display images that aren't included in
> the eMail as an attachment. This is a security feature. But, my eMail program is free, and
> is written by a NZ'er
>>People seem to manage browsing the web without issues, and that's a far
>>less controlled and predictable environment than email.
> That all depends on which web browser you use......but that's a seperate flame war.
> David G King : d_king@x...
> zl1dgk@n... ZL1DGK
> http://dking.gen.nz http://freet.blogspot.com
> wlug mailing list | wlug@l...
> Unsubscribe: http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/wlug
More information about the wlug
NOTICE: This is an archive of a public mailing list. The University of Waikato is not responsible for its contents.